White Plains Probation Violation Lawyer
Former Westchester County Prosecutor Defending Your Freedom
A parole violation in White Plains can send you back to prison for the rest of your original sentence. There's no grace period and no second warning. If you've received a violation warrant or think one is coming, the next 48 hours may be the most important in your case.
White Plains probation violation attorney Michael J. Borrelli spent his prosecutorial career inside the Westchester County District Attorney's office, serving as Supervisor for the New Rochelle, Northern Westchester, and Yorktown branches. He advised more than 20 police agencies across the county. He's seen from the inside how violation cases are built and presented. Now he uses that knowledge to defend people facing parole revocation proceedings in Westchester County and beyond.
Your freedom is at stake. Call (914) 928-2766 now for a free, confidential consultation, available 24/7, including nights and weekends.
Technical vs. Non-Technical Parole Violations in New York
New York divides parole violations into two categories, and that distinction shapes nearly everything that follows.
- Technical Violations: Technical violations involve breaking a condition of release without committing a new crime. Common examples include a missed curfew, a failed drug test, a skipped appointment with your parole officer, or an unreported change of address.
- Non-Technical Violations: Non-technical violations generally involve being accused of committing a new crime while on parole.
The Less Is More Act, which went into full effect on March 1, 2022, reshaped how New York handles both categories.
Changes Under the Less Is More Act
For most technical violations, the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) must now issue a notice to appear in community court rather than detaining you on the spot. The Act limits reincarceration for technical violations and raises the standard of proof at every stage of the revocation process. It also provides the right to counsel from the start.
Consequences of Non-Technical Violations
Non-technical violations carry steeper consequences. If you're accused of committing a new crime while on parole, you must be brought before a judge within 24 hours for a recognizance hearing. A new felony conviction that results in a state prison sentence triggers automatic revocation of supervision with no hearing required. Knowing which category your alleged violation falls into drives every decision your defense attorney makes.
The Parole Revocation Hearing Process
Once a parole violation warrant is issued, a Preliminary Hearing generally must occur within 5 days if you're detained or 10 days if you're released on recognizance. Under the Less Is More Act, the state has to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that a violation occurred. If that standard is met, the case moves to a Final Revocation Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge.
Key stages of the revocation process:
- Preliminary Hearing: This is where challenges to the state's evidence begin, so early attorney involvement is critical.
- Final Revocation Hearing: Must be completed within 30 days (if you're detained) or 45 days (if you're not). In either case, the state must prove the violation by clear and convincing evidence.
Possible outcomes may include time assessment (reincarceration), placement in a DOCCS treatment program, revoke-and-restore to supervision, or full dismissal if the charges aren't sustained.
Decades of Experience Inside Westchester County's Justice System
Parole violation proceedings in Westchester County involve many of the same prosecutors, law enforcement agencies, and hearing officers Michael worked alongside for years. That institutional familiarity isn't something you can learn from a textbook. He understands not only what the rules say but how they're applied in practice by local parole officers and Administrative Law Judges.
Michael has handled thousands of criminal cases and maintains a near-perfect success rate across more than 40 felony criminal trials, including charges of murder, robbery, burglary, and attempted murder. That trial-tested judgment carries directly into parole revocation defense, where the ability to cross-examine witnesses and challenge evidence under pressure can influence the outcome.
Unlike firms that send junior associates to handle your appearances, Michael personally attends 99% of client court dates. When you hire him, he's the attorney standing next to you.
Michael is an active member of the Westchester County Bar Association, the New York State Bar Association, and the New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. He was also appointed by Presiding Justice Hon. A. Gail Prudenti to serve on the Committees on Character and Fitness of the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, a judicial appointment held by very few practicing defense attorneys.
Talk to a Parole Violation Attorney in White Plains, NY Now
Parole revocation cases move fast. Preliminary hearings can be scheduled within days of your arrest, and every day without representation is a day the state uses to build its case against you.
We offer free, confidential consultations 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Whether it's midnight or a holiday weekend, you'll reach someone who can step in quickly. We serve clients in White Plains and throughout Westchester County. Hablamos español.
Call (914) 928-2766 today to discuss your case with The Law Offices of Michael J. Borrelli, P.L.L.C..
Proven Case Results
-
Not Guilty People v. AK (2022)Not Guilty People v. AK (2022)
Jury Trial not guilty verdict DWI - Vehicle and Traffic Law 1192(3) - also won DMV Refusal Hearing
-
Successfully Supressed People v. PN (2023)Successfully Supressed People v. PN (2023)
Successfully suppressed the .22 blood results after hearings on an Aggravated DWI arrest.
-
Not Guilty People v. NP (2023)Not Guilty People v. NP (2023)
Jury Trial not guilty verdict DWI - Vehicle and Traffic Law 1192(3)
-
Not Guilty People v. CA (2024)Not Guilty People v. CA (2024)
Jury Trial not guilty verdict Sex Abuse in the Second Degree.
-
Charges Dismissed People v. EA (2024)Charges Dismissed People v. EA (2024)
(Cortlandt Town Court) DWI charges dismissed by Court after successful Speedy Trial and Discovery Violation Motion
-
Charges Dismissed People v. KA (2024)Charges Dismissed People v. KA (2024)
Stalking charges dismissed by Court after successful Speedy Trial and Discovery Violation Motion
-
Not Guilty People v. EB (2025)Not Guilty People v. EB (2025)
Non-Jury Trial – not guilty verdict on DWI .22 BAC
-
Not Guilty People v. NO (2025)Not Guilty People v. NO (2025)
(Rye Town Court) Non-Jury-Trial: not guilty verdict on DWI with substantial medical evidence in favor of the client.
-
Not Guilty People v. MC (2025)Not Guilty People v. MC (2025)
(Mamaroneck Village Court) Not Guilty Verdict on Non-Jury Trial DWI charge